Activity 4.2 Environmental Policy Frameworks

 

Environmental conflict resolution: Framing and intractability--an introduction. (2003)	Context in environmental conflicts: Where you stand depends on where you sit. (2003)	Environmental Framing Consortium. (2005)
Identity “Who am I ?”Discusses how identities shape interest, values, and motivations, affecting how conflicts are framed and resolved.	Cultural Shapes environmental conflicts by influencing stakeholders' values, beliefs, and perceptions. Demographic How factors like age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status influence identities and perspectives.	Identity How individual and group identities influence perception
Characterization How the authors define and describe the different elements in environmental conflict resolution.		Characterization How environmental issues are defined and portrayed
Conflict Management How different stakeholders interrupt conflicts through various frames, such as economic or ecological.	Legal Shaping the rights and responsibilities that influence stakeholders' positions    Political Important context that impacts environmental conflicts by influencing stakeholder interest	Conflict Management Strategies for addressing and resolving disputes related to environmental issues
Fact-Finding How people gather relevant information to understand environmental conflicts.	Technological How tools and innovations affect environmental conflicts.	Fact-Frames  The presentation of data, statistics, and scientific evidence related to environmental issues.
Social Control Explains how social control can shape perceptions of legitimacy and authority, which impacts how conflicts are managed and resolved.
Power Highlights how power imbalances among stakeholders can affect the negotiation process and outcomes.	Economic Essential context that influences environmental conflicts by shaping stakeholder interest and priorities.
Risk People's perceptions and responses to potential threats.		Risk The potential dangers or uncertainties related to environmental issues are communicated
	Ecological How ecological factors such as biodiversity, ecosystem health, and resource availability influence stakeholder interest.	Views of Nature Frames Explores different perspectives on the relationship between humans and the natural environment.
		Gain/Loss Frames  How environmental issues are presented (gains) or drawbacks(losses).

My 5 frameworks 

Risk Frame - To identify, assess, and manage risk

            Views of Nature Frame - Different perspectives on the relationship between humans and the natural environment 

            Fact Frame -presenting data, statistics, and scientific evidence 

            Conflict Frame- how environmental issues are presented as contentious or diverse topics

            Justice Frame -ethical and equitable aspects of environmental issues, emphasizing fairness, rights, and social justice

 

Justification

I selected the frames of risk, views of nature, fact, conflict, and justice because they each offer a distinct perspective that enhances our understanding of environmental issues and informs our approach to addressing them.

The risk frame is essential in highlighting the uncertainties and potential dangers associated with environmental problems. By focusing on risk, we can better communicate the urgency of issues like climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss. This frame encourages stakeholders to consider the worst-case scenarios and the long-term implications of inaction. It also allows for a more proactive approach, as it emphasizes the need for risk assessment and management strategies to mitigate potential harm. Understanding risk helps in mobilizing both public support and policy action, as people are often motivated by the desire to avoid negative outcomes.

Views of nature frame our understanding of the relationship between humans and the environment. Different cultures and societies have varied perspectives on nature, ranging from seeing it as a resource to be exploited to viewing it as a sacred entity deserving of respect. This frame is crucial because it influences how individuals and communities interact with the environment. By exploring diverse views of nature, we can foster a deeper appreciation for ecological systems and promote sustainable practices that align with these values. Recognizing that our views shape our actions allows for more meaningful engagement with environmental issues.

The fact frame is foundational in grounding discussions in empirical evidence. In an era where misinformation can easily proliferate, relying on facts helps build credibility and informed decision-making. By presenting data and scientific research, this frame ensures that arguments are based on objective information rather than emotions or assumptions. It plays a vital role in educating stakeholders about the realities of environmental challenges and the effectiveness of potential solutions. A fact-based approach is essential for effective advocacy and policy formulation, as it provides a solid basis for discussions and negotiations.

The conflict frame is significant in acknowledging the differing interests and values among various stakeholders. Environmental issues often involve complex power dynamics and competing priorities, from industrial interests to community rights. By framing discussions around conflict, we can better understand the challenges inherent in finding common ground and developing effective solutions. This frame encourages dialogue among stakeholders, highlighting the need for negotiation and compromise. However, it’s important to navigate conflicts carefully to avoid deepening divisions and to focus on collaborative problem-solving.

Finally, the justice frame adds an ethical dimension to environmental discussions. Environmental issues frequently impact marginalized communities disproportionately, raising questions of equity and fairness. This frame emphasizes the importance of recognizing and addressing these disparities. By advocating for environmental justice, we can ensure that all voices are heard and that solutions are inclusive. This approach not only promotes social equity but also strengthens the overall effectiveness of environmental policies by fostering community engagement and support.

 

References

• Davis, C. B., & Lewicki, R. J. (2003). Environmental conflict resolution: Framing and intractability--an introduction. Environmental Practice, 5(3), 200-206. DAVISandLEWICKI_2003_Environmental_conflict_resolution__Framing.pdf

• Download DAVISandLEWICKI_2003_Environmental_conflict_resolution__Framing.pdf

• 
  

• Bryan, T. (2003). Context in environmental conflicts: Where you stand depends on where you sit. Environmental Practice, 5(3), 256-264. BRYAN_2003_Context_in_environmental_conflict Framing.pdf

• Environmental Framing Consortium. (2005). Framing choices.

• Links to an external site.

•  Understanding Environmental Problems. http://www.intractableconflict.org/environmentalframing/framing_choices.shtml

Biggs, A. (2020, May 6). Activity 4.2 environmental policy frameworks. ENVR 1301. https://envr1301-abigailbiggs.blogspot.com/2020/05/activity-42-environmental-policy.html

Links to an external site.

 

Guajardo, G. (2020, May 8). Activity 4.2 environmental policy frameworks. ENVR 1301. https://envr1301-genesisguajardo.blogspot.com/2020/05/activity-42-environmental-policy.html

Links to an external site.

 

Lewis, M. (2020, Dec 2). Activity 4.2 - Environmental policy frameworks. ENVR 1301. https://environmentalscience1301madisonlewis.blogspot.com/2020/12/activity-42-environmental-policy.html

Links to an external site.